The battle for women’s rights in the United States has been long and tumultuous, marked by major milestones such as the right to vote, access to birth control, and the landmark case of Roe v. Wade. As recent events have shown, the protection of women’s rights is not always guaranteed. One of the most significant and controversial moments in this ongoing struggle came in 1973 with the Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion nationwide. However, after the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, questions have resurfaced about the state of women's rights in the U.S. today, compared to those of their grandmothers.
The Roe v. Wade Era: A Groundbreaking Decision
In 1973, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Roe v. Wade, recognizing that the right to privacy extended to a woman’s decision to terminate a pregnancy. The case hinged on the notion that the government could not unduly restrict a woman’s access to abortion, as it interfered with her constitutional right to privacy. The decision was hailed as a victory for women’s autonomy over their own bodies and reproductive choices.
For the generation of women who grew up in the 1950s and 1960s, this was a revolutionary development. Before Roe v. Wade, abortion laws were largely restrictive, varying by state. Women seeking abortions had few options and often resorted to unsafe and illegal procedures, with devastating health consequences. The 1973 decision not only legalized abortion but also gave women the legal right to control their reproductive futures.
The Role of Roe v. Wade in Advancing Women’s Rights
Roe v. Wade became more than just a legal precedent; it became a symbol of the broader fight for women’s rights in the 20th century. It was part of the wave of progressive social changes in the post-WWII era, where women were pushing for greater participation in the workforce, educational opportunities, and political influence.
For women in the 1970s and beyond, Roe v. Wade represented more than just the freedom to choose abortion. It symbolized the right to make personal decisions about their own bodies, without undue government interference. This right empowered women to delay or forgo childbearing in favor of career advancement, educational attainment, and personal development. The decision played a significant role in the increasing representation of women in the workforce and contributed to the feminist movement’s fight for gender equality.
The Changing Landscape: Overturning Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. Jackson
Fast forward to 2022, and the U.S. Supreme Court shocked the nation by overturning Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The ruling effectively removed the constitutional right to abortion and left the legality of the procedure up to individual states. This decision set off a wave of legal battles, with several states quickly enacting laws that either severely restricted or banned abortion outright. As of January 8, 2025, 12 states have banned abortion (Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia).
The Dobbs decision was a stark reversal of decades of precedent and ignited intense debates about the future of women’s rights in the U.S. While many states had already been passing restrictive abortion laws in anticipation of Roe v. Wade being overturned, the Dobbs ruling solidified these efforts and created a patchwork of abortion laws across the country. In states like Texas, Oklahoma, and Mississippi, abortion is nearly impossible to obtain, while in others, it remains accessible.
For women today, especially those in states with restrictive abortion laws, the rollback of Roe v. Wade has profound implications. Access to abortion has been reduced, and in some cases, it is now considered a criminal act to seek or provide one. Women in these states are left with fewer options, potentially having to travel across state lines to access reproductive care. Such an option is not available to everyone, particularly those with limited financial resources or who are living in rural areas.
Banning Abortion Doesn’t Stop Abortions, It Just Makes Them Less Safe
The claim that banning abortion will stop abortions is widely debunked by both historical and contemporary evidence. In fact, restricting abortion access doesn’t eliminate the procedure; it simply forces women to seek dangerous alternatives. A study by the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks reproductive health policy, found that while the number of legal abortions decreased in countries with restrictive laws, the number of unsafe abortions actually increased, leading to more women dying or suffering long-term health complications.
When abortion is made illegal, women still seek the procedure, but often through unsafe means. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 25 million unsafe abortions occur globally each year, mostly in countries with restrictive abortion laws. In the U.S., prior to the legalization of abortion in 1973, illegal abortions were rampant and dangerous, resulting in thousands of deaths. Post-1973, the abortion rate declined significantly, but as access becomes restricted once again, the specter of unsafe abortion procedures is returning.
Further, research has shown that restrictive abortion laws disproportionately affect women from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, who are less likely to afford the cost of traveling to another state for an abortion. Furthermore, women with low incomes are more likely to be impacted by state-level abortion bans than wealthier women. These women often cannot afford the logistical, financial, or emotional burdens associated with obtaining an abortion out of state. For many, the path to a safe abortion becomes much harder to navigate. The impact of abortion bans, therefore, is not just a health issue but a social justice issue.
Should Law Reflect Society’s Morals or Strive for Equality?
As debates over abortion intensify, another key question emerges: Should the law reflect the morals of society, or should it work toward striving for equality and individual rights? The overturning of Roe v. Wade has reignited this discussion, as many argue that laws should be grounded in equality, providing all citizens the ability to make personal decisions without government interference. Others believe that laws should reflect societal values and the collective moral compass of the community, even if that means restricting certain rights.
In the case of abortion, many believe the law should safeguard women’s rights to make their own choices, reflecting a commitment to individual freedom and gender equality. On the other hand, those advocating for restrictions argue that the moral fabric of society — particularly the value of life — should shape the legal framework. This tension between individual rights and societal values remains central to the ongoing debate over reproductive rights.
A Step Backwards for Women's Rights?
Given the shifting legal landscape, it is understandable to ask whether women today have fewer rights than their grandmothers did. While many legal protections for women have expanded in recent decades — such as workplace equality, the right to divorce, and greater access to higher education — the loss of Roe v. Wade has brought to light the vulnerability of women’s rights in America. It suggests that the battle for women’s rights is far from over, and that progress is not always linear.
For many grandmothers, the fight for basic rights like voting, equal pay, and reproductive rights was still ongoing, and Roe v. Wade represented one of the significant achievements of that era. But now, with the rollback of abortion rights and the uncertainty surrounding other potential challenges to women’s autonomy (such as birth control or same-sex marriage), some argue that today's women are facing a backlash that threatens to undo the progress made by their grandmothers.
Generational Divide: The Changing Meaning of Women's Rights
There is also a generational divide in how women perceive their rights. For many younger women, the right to abortion was taken for granted as a cornerstone of personal freedom and autonomy. To have that right revoked has been a shocking and disorienting experience, forcing them to confront the reality that legal rights, once won, can be undone.
Conversely, older generations, especially those who fought for the legalization of abortion and other rights, may see the current moment as a painful reminder that the struggle for gender equality is never truly "won." The emotional and political weight of these decisions resonates differently with those who lived through the eras of legal battles for women's rights, and the rollback of Roe v. Wade has reignited a sense of urgency among many women who fought for these very freedoms.
Conclusion: A Call to Action
So, do women today have fewer rights than their grandmothers did? The answer is complicated. In many areas, women's rights have expanded, and significant progress has been made, especially in the workplace and educational spheres. However, the overturning of Roe v. Wade and the ongoing challenges to reproductive rights have highlighted the fragility of these gains. Women today are faced with a new set of battles, and the fight for autonomy over their own bodies is far from over.
Ultimately, the question of whether women have fewer rights than their grandmothers cannot be answered with a simple "yes" or "no." The landscape of women’s rights is constantly evolving, and what is clear is that women must continue to advocate for their rights and resist efforts to roll back the progress that has been made over the past century. Women of all ages, from grandmothers to granddaughters, must stand together in defense of the hard-won freedoms of the past and ensure that they are not lost in the future.
Comments